SHASTA
COLLEGE LIBRARY
11555
Old Oregon Trail * PO Box 496006 * Redding,
CA 96049-6006
|
 |
|
Home
| Library
Catalog | Articles
& Databases |
Online eBooks | Search
Internet | Local
Links | Library
Services | Help
|
Website Evaluation:
The Good, the Bad, &
the Ugly
Books are often the resource of choice when you're after comprehensive
coverage of an issue. A quick glance at a book's title page and jacket
will afford you a title, place and date of publication, author bio and
credentials, and even some reviews. Examine the preface, table of
contents, index, and bibliography and you begin to gauge the volume's strengths,
shortcomings, and bias. But many important topics, especially those
of a local nature, don't have the large readership that economically justifies
publication of an entire book. Other stories are too current to be
well represented by the mainstream press (there's a lag of at least nine
months between a book's completion and its publication). For these stories,
the Internet, where publishing is inexpensive, instantaneous, and simple,
is heaven sent. But when anyone can publish anything, finding the
right site among the billions and evaluating the information contained
in that site requires a healthy measure of skepticism.
This
task is further complicated because the Internet is a medium where the
author also serves as editor and publisher. The helpful publication information
taken for granted in print books and magazines is often hidden or missing
from webpages. Determining bias and reliability requires some detective
work and much critical thinking. The Shasta College librarians recommend
that each website visited be scrutinized for:
-
Authority
Is an author named? What are his academic or professional qualifications?
What else has he written? Where else has he published? Can you contact
the author if you have more questions?
-
Accuracy
Veracity
is difficult to determine if you are unfamiliar with your topic.
Begin your research with a published source (such as an online
encyclopedia) then return to the Internet for additional references.
You are now better able to judge if the data is reliable. Is the source
of the data cited? Is the webpage well maintained and well written?
Broken weblinks, poor spelling, and sloppy grammar indicate a haphazard
approach to research as well as reporting.
-
Objectivity
What is the purpose of this site: To educate? To inform? To report on a
study? To sell a product? Who, in addition to the named author, sponsors
the site: A school system or university (.edu)? A non-profit organization
(.org)? A business (.com or .net)? The U.S. Government (.gov) or U.S. military
(.mil)? Does the site contain a detectable bias? Does the site advertise
products? What other sites are linked to or from the webpage that
you are examining?
-
Timeliness
When was the page most recently updated? Is the data contained in
the page current?
-
Depth
of Coverage How detailed is the information? Is it repeating
information that you already have or is it providing new data or a new
perspective on the topic? Is it the appropriate level of depth and
sophistication for a college student?
Try this 5 point technique on
at least one website from each of the four categories listed below.
Evaluation strategies are outlined in the handout,
Consider
the Source.
-
The Good
-
The Bad (or kind of silly)
-
The Not Bad at All (but can you find the bias?)
-
The Ugly
(compare with Alliance
for Aging Research )
Visit these pages to learn more about critical
evaluation of webpages:
|
Home
| Library
Catalog | Articles
& Databases |
Online eBooks | Search
Internet | Local
Links | Library
Services | Help
|
URL: http://library.shastacollege.edu/webevaluation.html
Electronic Mail: webmaster@library.shastacollege.edu
Updated: 11/17/04